The first satellite image shows the section of the building that was hit
by the Boeing. In the image below, the second ring of the building is also
visible. It is clear that the aircraft only hit the first ring. The four
interior rings remain intact. They were only fire-damaged after the initial
Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling
at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour* only damaged the outside of the
*250 mph when landing, 600 mph in flight.
The photograph above shows the lawn in front of the damaged building.
You'll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's
first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?
Did you find the Boeing? Can you still defend the official version of events?
> Well done! Remember to get in touch with master of illusion, David Copperfield.
He'll be glad to hear from you!
You found the official version lacking in something (like a Boeing, for example):
> If you begin to question whether a Boeing really did crash on the Pentagon
then, no doubt, you'll be wondering what happened to the aircraft that disappeared.
You will probably ask yourself why the US government even told you this story
in the first place and you'll start asking yourself lots of other questions
besides. Don't worry! This is perfectly normal!
Source: www.reseauvoltaire.net - The photographs are official images and
available on US army sites. See also the larger collection of photographs
in our "Pièces à conviction" gallery - Translation: Mr Sly
- NB: Appearing on bookshelves end of March, the investigation by the Chair
of the Réseau Voltaire into the September 11 attacks, examining the
Bin Laden networks and American secret service involvement.